翻訳と辞書
Words near each other
・ United States v. Janis
・ United States v. Jawad
・ United States v. Jicarilla Apache Nation
・ United States v. John
・ United States v. John (1978)
・ United States v. John (2010)
・ United States v England (1950 FIFA World Cup)
・ United States v Silk
・ United States v. $124,700 in U.S. Currency
・ United States v. 11 1/4 Dozen Packages of Articles Labeled in Part Mrs. Moffat's Shoo-Fly Powders for Drunkenness
・ United States v. 12 200-ft. Reels of Film
・ United States v. 50 Acres of Land
・ United States v. Adams
・ United States v. Agrawal
・ United States v. Alcoa
United States v. Alvarez
・ United States v. Alvarez-Machain
・ United States v. American Library Ass'n
・ United States v. American Tobacco Co.
・ United States v. American Trucking Ass'ns
・ United States v. Ancheta
・ United States v. Andrus
・ United States v. Antelope
・ United States v. Apple Inc.
・ United States v. Approximately 64,695 Pounds of Shark Fins
・ United States v. Archer Daniels Midland Co.
・ United States v. Arnold
・ United States v. Article Consisting of 50,000 Cardboard Boxes More or Less, Each Containing One Pair of Clacker Balls
・ United States v. Arvizu
・ United States v. ASCAP


Dictionary Lists
翻訳と辞書 辞書検索 [ 開発暫定版 ]
スポンサード リンク

United States v. Alvarez : ウィキペディア英語版
United States v. Alvarez

''United States v. Alvarez'', , was a United States Supreme Court case in which the Court struck down the Stolen Valor Act, a federal law that criminalized false statements about having a military medal. The law had been passed as an effort to stem instances where people falsely claimed to have won the medal in an attempt to protect the "valor" of those who really had. While a 6-3 majority of the Supreme Court agreed that the law was unconstitutional under the First Amendment's free speech protections, it could not agree on a single rationale. Four justices concluded that a statement's falsity is not enough, by itself, to exclude speech from First Amendment protection. Another two justices concluded that while false statements were entitled to some protection, the Stolen Valor Act was invalid because it could have achieved its objectives in less restrictive ways.
Veteran organizations and politicians reacted negatively. Several months after the decision, both chambers of Congress passed new versions of the Stolen Valor Act based on the suggestions in the Court's opinion. Despite the Supreme Court having struck down the conviction under the Act, Alvarez remained in prison for fraud on other matters.
==Background==


抄文引用元・出典: フリー百科事典『 ウィキペディア(Wikipedia)
ウィキペディアで「United States v. Alvarez」の詳細全文を読む



スポンサード リンク
翻訳と辞書 : 翻訳のためのインターネットリソース

Copyright(C) kotoba.ne.jp 1997-2016. All Rights Reserved.